Jump to content

Stavi

Supporters
  • Posts

    423
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

5,709 profile views
  1. *sigh* - 2 or 3 isn't "A lot of people" - Who said "MS must be lying about gamepass numbers"? - Who said "It must be all made up"? So what you're saying is a bunch of nope. All that was pointed out that they published the stats and numbers that it suits them to post using an undefined term (lookalike). My eyes are fine. But thanks for your genuine concern.
  2. Nope Nope - no one said that Nope - no one said that Nope
  3. Brilliant - thanks. These are the EU ones, will they be ok or should I go with the world wide ones?
  4. Dumb question... I'm getting my series x today and want to do the best deal as outlined in the first post. The options for the 12-month Live Gold codes on CDKeys are bewildering to someone new to xbox (most mention the One or the 360, but no mention of the series x) and I don't want to by £120 worth of the wrong codes. Would some be kind enough to post a direct link to the correct code that I need? Many thanks in advance
  5. And added mud buildup, particle effects, 4K, and faster loading times. At first I didn't notice too much difference, but then my son played the PS4 version so he could play with his mate and I was shocked!
  6. I'd add Superhot VR and Pistol Whip to that
  7. I was with you until this. You monster.
  8. So it's ok to deny the experience to whole sections of society because some people are worried about their own self control?
  9. Yeah, there’s known issues with the Xbox version but a fix is in the works
  10. To be fair I haven’t seen any anger here, but you really don’t have to look very far to find it. As someone else mentioned earlier in the thread most of the responses have been civil (even if I think some have been missing the points raised). That’s why I choose to spend my time on this forum. However, I have no wish to derail this thread anymore than I already have (sorry!), so will leave it at that.
  11. I think this is where I have a problem. Some more hidden disabilities make it harden to focus or concentrate. I accept that the need to concentrate makes the game more compelling, but it’s not that linear, it’s more of a spectrum. I wouldn’t want From to change their approach to game design, but what irks me is the argument they shouldn’t even offer options to allow people of varying ability to play the game, even if it has no impact on everyone else. Of course, in reality it may not be practical, but I get annoyed at the anger displayed by the very suggestion of such options. Why should people get so angry at options that literally have no impact on their experience of the game, especially when those very options allow a wider variety of people to experience it. That’s why it comes across as gatekeeping.
  12. Several people have already made suggestions about how though. Let’s take 2 suggestions for example, say a wider parry window and lower damage requirements. Do you honestly think adding those as options would massively increase the budget of the game or impact From Software who have multimillion selling games under their belt? Wanting games to be more accessible is not behaving ‘like an entitled’, but perhaps presenting several strawman arguments defending the lack of that accessibility is.
  13. but why do you care so much about the budget? Unless of course you don’t
  14. It’s blatant gatekeeping, but watching some of the mental gymnastics being performed to suggest it isn’t is entertaining. Why not add a few simple options to allow less able people to play the game (either through disability or otherwise) which would have literally no effect on the default option? Other than take away a false sense of achievement for those more able, of course. From aren’t going to change their approach, and that’s their decision to make. Some of the arguments defending this approach are deliciously bonkers though.
  15. Massive installed user base, they'd be crazy not too. Not to mention all the marketing, xmas sales etc. etc. They're not great, but they're not that bad either.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.