Jump to content

And

Members
  • Posts

    12,552
  • Joined

Posts posted by And

  1. errr its just a black square??
    It's not. But it's not far off.

    I don't get it. Is it a dog again?

    because I blatently won't take anything else this month, even though every competition I think about something I could do, and I really do want to start entering this again, and because dogs CAN look up

    4449816473_c40d7dd6a4.jpg

    Now that is a picture of a dog, and what a fine looking dog she is too, is she yours?

  2. Got tickets for the screamadelica gigs in november, should be good if Primal Scream the band turn up rather than Primal Scream's Drunken Pogues tribute act.

  3. Well, I finished the game, then did the zombie dlc, then started playthrough 2.

    When I downloaded this I took my character back to playthrough 1 and warped to this dlc.

    Result, 6 levels between me and the enemies, it's a joke, thinking of binning it off and just running through playthrough 2 as quick as and then trying it. Or (much more likely) not bothering and finishing off Mass effect 2.

  4. I'm currently playing with a lvl 42 siren. I havent seen an enemy in the dlc greater than lvl 36. Played it for about an hour and a half, and just blitzed through it, an unstoppable killing machine mowing down everything i see, with no need for tactics, guile or even getting out of the way of their bullets.

    I also didn't see a single gun worth picking up due to the huge discrepancy in levels.

    And as a final fuck you, as I was a way higher level than the game I was getting 3 xp per kill, and basically nothing for missions. They were all trivial, so I maybe moved 1/3rd of the way to my next level.

    Kind of makes the whole endeavour pointless and dull.

    So in short, no challenge, no loot, no levelling up = no fun.

    Poor, very poor, very disappointing.

  5. Quick question, does anyone know whether you can still play online with folks if you don't have all dlc? I've got Ned and have this queued but skipped the underdome one as it looked a bt weak, will this prevent me playing with people who did get the underdome?

  6. That was extraordinarily difficult and i'm already thinking of other albums that maybe should be on the list.

    For what it's worth:

    01 – Massive attack - Blue lines

    02 - Spiritualised - Ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space

    03 - Massive attack - Mezzanine

    04 - DJ Shadow - Entroducing

    05 - The Stone Roses - The Second Coming

    06 – Radiohead - The Bends

    07 - Teenage Fanclub - Bandwagonesque

    08 – Leftfield - Leftism

    09 – Portishead - Roseland NYC

    10 - Chemical Brothers - Exit planet Dust

    11 – Ride - Going Blank again

    12 - Beastie Boys - ILL communication

    13 – Faithless - Reverence

    14 – Air - Moon Safari

    15 – Blur - Parklife

    16 – Verve - A Northern Soul

    17 - Massive attack - Protection

    18 - Happy Mondays - Pills Thrills and Belly aches

    19 - Neds Atomic dustbin - Godfodder

    20 – Unkle - Psyence Fiction

  7. 01 – Massive attack - Blue lines

    02 - Spiritualised - Ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space

    03 - Massive attack -Mezzanine

    04 - DJ Shadow - Entroducing

    05 - The Stone Roses - The Second Coming

    06 – Radiohead - The Bends

    07 - Teenage Fanclub - Bandwagonesque

    08 – Leftfield - Leftism

    09 – Portishead - Roseland NYC

    10 - Chemical Brothers - Exit planet Dust

    11 – Ride - Going Blank again

    12 - Beastie Boys - ILL communication

    13 – Faithless - Reverence

    14 – Air - Moon Safari

    15 – Blur - Parklife

    16 – Verve - A Northern Soul

    17 - Massive attack - Protection

    18 - Happy Mondays - Pills Thrills and Belly aches

    19 - Neds Atomic dustbin - Godfodder

    20 – Unkle - Psyence Fiction

  8. They looks fine to me.

    And I was so tempted to Photoshop this into an Odelay! cover:

    Be my guest

    leave sRGB well alone - it makes the colours dull and flat - the difference between it and Adobe 1998 is quite apparent. if you open an sRGB file in Photoshop and change it to Adobe 1998 you will see what i mean.

    but it is no good just switching to one of the included profiles - if you are serious you'll need to buy something like ColorMunki to calibrate your screen so it gives the best output in relation to your surroundings - ambient light, artificial light etc. of course, the best thing to do is to calibrate and work in complete darkness but only freaks do that.

    i have my MacBook (and external monitor) set to Adobe 1998 variants, spent about an hour on each getting the colours right. you can use OSX's built-in calibration tool (open System Prefs., then Displays, then Colour, Calibrate...) as a stop gap. it doesn't create a 'proper' profile as it doesn't measure anything like a hardware add-on would but it will help you understand the calibration process.

    in our office we Munki our screens about once a month because of the change in light levels throughout the year. calibration is essential if you print your work - you want what appears on the screen to be as close as possible to what is put onto paper. whereas doing work for screen poses problems because everyone has their monitor set up differently, plus various browsers (and OS's) display colours in their own unique way.

    I'd previously done the apple calibration steps but am now on Adobe 1998, looks pretty good, will stick with that for a while. Cheers

    This is a pretty good (and not too technical) read: Chris Marquardt

    He did a podcast on it too: Link

    Thank's I'll take a look.

  9. Hi

    Been reading the enormous book of photography my wife bought me for giftmas and it recommends you set your monitor to an industry standard calibrated setting.

    Just wondering what you guys use?

    I've an imac 20 inch and was using the imac calibrated setting, but it recommends either sRGB or Adobe 1998, the SRGB is very similar in appearance to the calibrated mac, but the Adobe one looks quite different.

    Also, have I fucked up my photo's? they look good (to me) on my mac, but does this translate to the web?

    Here's my flickr stream, http://www.flickr.com/photos/24274413@N06/ , do the colours look ok? or overdone?

    Thanks

  10. Manchester. It's an average house spider, about the size of 10p coin. They're ugly fuckers up close.

    Edit: WTF, I've just noticed it's got 10 legs.

    The front two are teeth... I say you take off an nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

    I made my first attempt of a "Mini Planet" today:

    Amazing, how?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.