Jump to content

Jim Miles

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jim Miles

  1. Just read your first post in the anti-parenting thread. You go for it mate, sounds good! Uni at 28 - wish I could have done that! Seriously! I mean, I'm not 28 yet but you get what I mean.


  2. Dealing some righteous blows in the anti-parenting thread. RESPEC'


  3. Super Nintendo, Super NEZZ, or SNEZZ, but never ess-enn-ee-ess for me.
  4. As usual, the comments are gold. "This dude is Wolverine."
  5. I played the demo co-op with some friends yesterday (first two of them did one scenario then I did the other with another) and it was off the chain. The co-op works so well, I loved it. The highlight for me has to be when my partner lost all his life and was being attacked so I just threw a grenade into the malaise and green herbed him as he stumbled out with a huge explosion going off behind him (exploding barrels were involved too). Awesome.
  6. Oh man I just remembered that time we played Ikaruga co-op and I had been drinking mucho vino. LOL, good times.

  7. Is it Ghostbusters 2 Battle Royale 3?
  8. Even if you tried, you couldn't make it more obvious that you don't listen to radio and will only bother tuning into something if it's on TV. Better luck expressing yourself next time.
  9. Because it adds almost nothing to the experience. It's not a judgement so much as an observation. If they wanted to make the show for iMax with full smell-o-vision and rumbly seats requiring the Steel Battalion controller it would still be a good show, but you could also still say that aspects of the medium in which it was presented were extraneous.
  10. I'm halfway through it on iPlayer and it's good but I think it would be better as a radio programme. That's a really small point, and it doesn't really matter but I do find I keep switching to look at other things while the guys are talking. I paused it to write this.
  11. I think it's generally pretty shaky ground when people harp on about a performance being bad, because we can never know what the actor* was going for or what they had been directed to do. I used to be exactly like you toonfool and just not get the bad acting thing (except when it was deliberately bad - like Dean Lerner in Darkplace - which is a skill all of its own). However, I came up with my own formulation of bad acting which I feel is better than complete relativism but also doesn't inhabit the snide negativity of herd opinion about what is bad acting (usually people are grossly unfair about it). Firstly, you need to view a single actor across a range of performances, and make sure you get a good sample of them when they're not being type cast. It is usually the case for many actors who are - IMO unfairly - classed as "bad" actors that they are just being recast as essentially the same character again and again and it's not really their fault. When you do this, you can start to see the signs of a "bad" actor. I believe there are two and only two such signs: 1.) The actor recycles mannerisms across roles to the extent of completely shattering the illusion that their character is an individual within a specific scenario. (e.g. Keanu Reeves looking faintly confused, Richard Gere sighing and nodding his head to the ground, Keira Knightley repeating that unique teeth-gnashing smile in every role she plays.) 2.) The actor "slips out of character" continually throughout a performance, again shattering the illusion of a consistent individual. (e.g. "forgetting" that they are supposed to be from a particular part of the world and reverting to a native accent or showing a blank expression when they should be reacting to the other characters around them.) I completely stand by my point about only being able to say for sure that an actor is "bad" by studying them over a range of performances, because no matter how "bad" or "unbelievable" or "paper thin" the performance appears, you can't be sure from just the one that it's not exactly what the actor intended and had been instructed to do. Once you see more though, it becomes obviously pretty quickly whether the actor has skill or not. *using the Guardian convention of "actor = male (actor) or female (actress)".
  12. I really loved Key's poetry this episode. Last episode the bit that had me choking and crying with laughter was Charlie's running out of toilet paper musical number but it was Key that really had me rolling on the floor this time. He's utterly brilliant. I enjoyed the episode, but Charlie was a bit too cunty and not as incisive as he can often be so that dampened things a bit. I'm not such a big fan any more of the bits when he's just watching something and swearing at it; it's starting to feel too puerile in comparison to his really great bits of analysis.
  13. I loved the first few X-Wing books. They took me right into their world, and went really well with playing the X-Wing and TIE Fighter series of games around my friends' houses. The Timothy Zahn series was pretty great but ultimately I ground to a halt half way through the second one and never returned. My favourite Star Wars books are the "Tales" series. Hit and miss, but the short story format was really readable and I loved the details linking character stories with events from the films. Even a poorly written story was fun to read in those collections, I found.
  14. I watched this with a friend as some practice for our Spanish, so no subtitles. We missed about 70% of the plot and kept cracking jokes throughout (which we always do with scary films as I don't think either of us much like being scared). I must have mimed holding a mobile phone while saying the line "shit just got real" about a dozen times. When the woman was watching the video of the disfigured kid writing my friend just goes "oh my GOD he's blaaaaaack" which cracked us both up. Really, really, not in the spirit of the film, but it still scared the shit out of me. I can't believe people who are saying it wasn't scary - I missed the subtleties of the plot (and have got shivers reading them in the spoilers in this thread), and I still felt mightily creeped out. Maybe even the scariest movie I've ever seen. What films are scarier?
  15. Jim Miles

    Put Here

    That's wicked. Is it the character screen Leona from King of Fighter 2002? Or 2000? Or 2001? I can't remember!
  16. I watched Chewed Up yesterday and think I know the bit you're talking about and I agree that it was actually shocking. It was all about the lead up, very skilfully done. I really enjoyed the whole thing but I agree about him getting into his swing. It took about 20 minutes to really take off and was then just dynamite.
  17. A4 is A4, surely!? That was probably an intentional gaff for the lolz and I've just spoilt it.
  18. What did this involve? I remember that scene vividly from the film - a line of guys having their balls cupped and being told to cough, looking dehumanised. Surely not that!?
  19. Of course, I should have known Davros would have done one! I'm going to cook that recipe, then get my friend to taste it to see if it's what she was talking about. If not I guess the quest continues - I'm slightly sceptical that Davros' uses biscuits for the base, when I'm sure the American-style one mentioned had a scratch-built base. James Martin's has a sponge flan case, but I'm not sure that was it either. Ho-hum. Experimentation time! Cheers guys.
  20. Yep, that sounds like the same thing I'm after. SOMEONE! PLEASE!
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.