Jump to content

donkeyk

Members
  • Posts

    518
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

3,385 profile views
  1. So Nintendo Direct came........and went. I swear, it might just be an MS employee was expertly trolling us when they 'accidentally' leaked those achievements Hopefully it's announced to coincide with the 25th anniversary in August - hopefully.....
  2. Perfect Dark’s single player is very inconsistent. For every Area 51 which is excellent, there is a Crash Site which is….not. The last two levels especially feel particularly rushed in development. Two of the three bonus missions are great, though. PD’s multiplayer however, is far superior - endlessly customisable and has most of the best multiplayer levels from Goldeneye included. Playing with Bots was great as well, even if it absolutely tanked the framerate. If the GE remaster does happen I would like to see them add more custom functions like PD had - would be a good QOL improvement, otherwise GE multiplayer is very basic by modern standards.
  3. 21 hours gone, and 1st and 2nd are less than a second apart….
  4. Shaping up to be a great finish - it’s started to rain quite a bit…. And the moving chicane Dacia is still going!
  5. Well quite - getting rid of the name is purely a PR exercise, and perhaps the Blizzard brand has not suffered in the same way as Activision has - toxicity in the workplace aside, Blizzard probably has a reputation for quality output and Activision....doesn't. One might be worth saving and the other not. Obviously a rebranding exercise would not absolve MS's responsibility to address the actual issues at hand in these workplaces - but they might deem it still worthwhile to draw a line in the sand. Symbolically, at least.
  6. Or drop the over-arching Activision brand name altogether, and just run with the individual studio names - Infinity Ward, Treyarch, et al. Could potentially do similar with Blizzard, if they're really keen to eradicate the more toxic brand names from existence.
  7. It seems to be much further along than the aborted XBLA version that was leaked. You’d have thought given the reasons why it was aborted last time (apparently Nintendo had agreed in principle so they [Rare] started work on it, only for Nintendo to change their mind before contracts were signed) that Rare/MS would not have put the time and effort in again unless they had binding contracts to actually realise a release/profit this time around. Once bitten and all that. I also think Nintendo are now a lot more relaxed about ‘their’ IP (not strictly theirs in this case, but you know what I mean) appearing on platforms other than their own compared to 2008, given their subsequent mobile releases and other change of business practices since. Under previous management they’d have preferred 100% of nothing (rather than a cut of the proceeds from a GE remaster for doing basically nothing) if it meant protecting their hardware platforms from dilution due to cross-platform releases. Clearly given the mobile releases et al they are now considerably more relaxed about this and will now take the free money being offered - and presumably it’ll also be appearing on Nintendo platforms. The leak probably made them realise that there was a lot of interest in a remaster - and that a cross-platform release is simply in their interest as a pure business case. I mean, they’ve got milking their back catalogue down to a fine art so might as well accept MS’s help to continue doing so… TL;DR - I highly doubt MS/Rare would have put the time and effort in again if Nintendo weren’t already on board. At least I hope - I’ve been dying for a remaster since Perfect Dark XBLA got released. EDIT: should’ve added most of this is purely conjecture on my part, but the logic that MS wouldn’t waste time without being certain it’d actually happen does make a release more than plausible.
  8. I know - I wasn’t being entirely serious with my previous comment On a more serious note, it’s these little things that I hope they bear in mind. I know it’s a reboot and trying to move the franchise on, but you need to be careful of alienating your existing fan base by deviating too much from the formula that worked. Hopefully they get the balance right - too early to tell at this point, of course.
  9. According to reports - no return of Johnny Gat And none of the characters have a terrible cockney accent. Pre-orcer cancelled.
  10. Nice to see the CRT working it's magic! Once the cores for 32-Bit machines mature, I might have to take the plunge myself....
  11. I wouldn't disagree with that. But if you're spending a chunk of change on modding a console, it might be because you want the best experience possible - which arguably you won't get with a Dreamcast-TV CRT combo. It was meant more with a 'have you considered....' sentiment rather than as a warning - especially if Sketch doesn't yet have a CRT. Not sure purchasing a TV CRT (given how much they now cost) specifically for Dreamcast would be the best option, that's all
  12. Just bear in mind that unless you want to play on a CRT specifically to play light gun games, it isn't really the best way to play Dreamcast - it outputs 480i, not 240p (except for a few Capcom beat em ups.) If you want a prog scan image then you'll need a downscaler. Alternatively, find an old CRT monitor with VGA input then get a VGA adapter - the vast majority of games can be forced to output VGA. Of course, you might not care about the lack of 240p, in which case carry on
  13. That's funny....that looks an awful lot like the Trinitron I sold on Facebook to a guy who said he planned to use it with a MiSTer Hope it serves you well! If I'd known you were a forumite I'd have let you leave with my son's bag of old toys that he tried to offer you as well
  14. So finished the final mission last night: actually kinda enjoyed it in a 'change of pace' sort of way. Apart from: Not very Hitman, but the last mission does give me hope that IOI could actually do a good job with the Bond licence - more of this in that game could be pretty tasty....
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.