clarebear Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 Am I the only person addicted to Hollyoaks? Its so much more pleasing to the eye to watch than Eastenders and Corination St. Im loving Tony Hutchinson, he's the new Mr C. But whats with the change in actresses for Clare's character??? Does anyone know why she's changed?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShend Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 Dunno, but i wish they'd changed 'The Chin' instead. Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Version2.0 Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 Apparantly the old Clare was replaced because her acting wasn't good enough. It's too easy to mock so I'm not gonna bother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 Apparantly the old Clare was replaced because her acting wasn't good enough. It's too easy to mock so I'm not gonna bother. You mean you cannot be bothered being proven wrong; Holyoaks is a great show; rumor has it according to Celebritybiz mag the next update to Holyoaks after hours is called Holloaks X, sexy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeK Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 You mean you cannot be bothered being proven wrong; Holyoaks is a great show; rumor has it according to Celebritybiz mag the next update to Holyoaks after hours is called Holloaks X, sexy! There'd better be shots of naked boobies though. Hollyoaks is fucking terrible aside from some rather lovely looking women in it. So, in effect Hollyoaks X should be the best thing ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Pibe Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 I quite like Hollyoaks. It's amusing nonsense. Entertaining whilst I eat my dinner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clarebear Posted April 11, 2006 Author Share Posted April 11, 2006 Apparantly the old Clare was replaced because her acting wasn't good enough. How do you know? She wasn't 'that bad' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.M.S Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 I quite like Hollyoaks. It's amusing nonsense. Entertaining whilst I eat my dinner. agreed. love the show personally, but can see it's short comings. The good thing is it doesnt take itself seriously and has fit birds in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrispinG Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 It did a nosedive a few months ago and has been unwatchably poor ever since. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.M.S Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 It did a nosedive a few months ago and has been unwatchably poor ever since. what? after the rape story? i agree with that, but how can you follow such a good storyline? i thought it was very well done personally, and now we have the alcohol storyline building up. It's above decent if you ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrispinG Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 It's poor. Very poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.M.S Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 It's poor. Very poor. compared to what? not compared to other soaps, that's for sure. The whole rape thing was done much better than any storyline in any other soaps recently. Corry is a bloody pantomine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winkerwatson Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 The rape thing, are you serious? Surely one of the worst 'issue' storylines in recent memory, even by Hollyoaks standards. Although I do enjoy it when characters deliver big cut and pasted from pamphlets in monologues to each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.M.S Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 You just rated Hollyoaks better than Coronation Street in terms of storyline. YOU LOSE! it's the dullest of all soaps, and you watch it! You lose! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rsdio Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 It used to be quite entertaining a while ago, then they started dragging out every storyline for fucking months on end. I think the serial killer bit was probably the start of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Version2.0 Posted April 11, 2006 Share Posted April 11, 2006 How do you know? She wasn't 'that bad' Just from what I've heard, I didn't think she was that bad either and it's not as if it really matters on Hollyoaks, people watch it for the odd/amusing storylines and partial nakedness. Course I see the 'old' Clare nearly every day fronting a billboard poster for a new New Look store opening soon so she's doing well for herself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeyboy Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 It's a pleasant enough way to waste time when eating your tea or recovering from a hangover on a Sunday morning. Granted, if it wasn't stuffed so full of gorgeous women I wouldn't give it the time of day as with most soaps. Shallow? Yes. Jessica's pretty lovely. By the way, which one was Clare again? I didn't realise an actress had changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hemzoozlefluff Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I watch it. Do I enjoy it? Well...I certainly enjoy making harsh comments about the characters particularly the "trolls" (twins) as I affectionately call them. Has one of them left though? I missed a load of episodes a while back....and i have a feeling she might have gone- there only seems to be the scummy alcoholic one left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanR Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 If you've been affected by any of the issues in todays hollyoaks thread, you can call the channel 4 help line on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eats hoops and leaves Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 That was quite useful to me atually. I went to channel4.com/health to see about the legal issues of sleeping with your teacher. Not that I am sleeping with my Goddess of a teacher I just wanted to know. Anyway, Hollyoaks FTFW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLNY Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 It's a pleasant enough way to waste time when eating your tea or recovering from a hangover on a Sunday morning. Granted, if it wasn't stuffed so full of gorgeous women I wouldn't give it the time of day as with most soaps. Yep, it's mandatory viewing where there's nothing more your mind can deal with beyond sub-standard acting, banal storylines and attractive girls. Hollyoaks's beauty is in the absolute simplicity of the programme. You don't need to know anyone's names or know the specifics of any of the storylines to dip in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Pibe Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I was out with some mates a few weeks ago and we were talking about women, as you do, and one of them said 'I wouldn't mind a few hours in a room with those twins from Hollyoaks!' He didn't mean in a 'to rid the World of them' way, either! His reasoning was - 'They're twins...and they're hot!' Bizarre. I like Mandy and was sad to see Darlene leave! Louise wears far too much make-up. Lee Hunter was a sad loss I also liked his little girlfriend with the funny laugh/voice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hemzoozlefluff Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Do you mean Zara? I LOATHED her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignige Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Just from what I've heard, I didn't think she was that bad either and it's not as if it really matters on Hollyoaks, people watch it for the odd/amusing storylines and partial nakedness. Course I see the 'old' Clare nearly every day fronting a billboard poster for a new New Look store opening soon so she's doing well for herself. She was on Channel five's version of America's next top model (UK version hosted by Rachel Hunter). She managed to last til halfway through the series, but was always pissed!! You can tell if someones acting is bad in hollyoaks, they show them for a few seconds then focus on someone else whilst the bad actor is still talking - like it's been voiced over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eats hoops and leaves Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I would love to write for Hollyoaks. You can imagine the ideas meetings. ANYTHING goes. I'm just waiting for UFOs to get involved somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murray Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I can't believe that guy with the cod-eye didn't bum the girl whose mum he fucked! What a fucking idiot. And he looked like he was gonna cry when she left, although to be fair, i would've looked the same. SHE HAD HOT PANTS ON AND EVERYTHING! Hopefully he'll (we'll) get another chance to see them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misterSquare Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I can't believe that guy with the cod-eye didn't bum the girl whose mum he fucked! What a fucking idiot. And he looked like he was gonna cry when she left, although to be fair, i would've looked the same. SHE HAD HOT PANTS ON AND EVERYTHING! Hopefully he'll (we'll) get another chance to see them Who did what now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Pibe Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Reese was seduced by his girlfriend's Mum!! She wants to break them up by sleeping with him. That's why I like Hollyoaks I don't mean Zara!! I mean the one who he set up his massage parlour with! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murray Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Who did what now? I don't know the character names (Reece?) is seeing this hottie, and her mum tried (and suceeded) seducing the daughters boyfriend (Reece) as a test (i think) Now as a result, when the daughter he's going out with wants some, he's all like, "Erm, i, err, can't". Cos when the hot daughter laid on his lap yeterday, he had 'visions' of her mum. He's an absolute twat. Definitely worth watching the omnibus on Sunday for a look at her in those hot pants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanR Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 threesome, surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now