Uzi Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Yeah, how did the ME review come into this? We were looking at terrible review quotes from DA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smitty Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Blame Vemsie you slags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massive Invisible Dog Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 "...THe misery of dragon age's dramatic ambition is only compounded by the gruesome quality if it's motion capture and character modelling: the glassy, immobile faces and rigid poise, the unnaturally large pale hands which waft about the air with all the expressiveness of table tennis bats; the unequipped weapons which float some distance from each character's backs..." I don't see what's so unreasonable about that. I haven't played Dragon Age but it's always horrible when a game tries for a really dramatic moment only for it to be completely undermined by some really bad lip syncing or motion caption or glitching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeyboy Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Just read the Edge review of Dragon Age. I think their main beef appears to be the erroneous depiction of homosexual blacksmiths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vemsie Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Blame Vemsie you slags. Hey, I wasn't the first to bring it up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 How dare Edge have the temerity to employ someone who didn't like Dragon Age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Janski Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Probably my fault on the Mass Effect front, I was only being silly really compared the low score for DA to the low score (imo!) for ME in a high-score-heavy xmas issue Person who mentioned developer apathy towards Bioware nailed it I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Worse than that, this joker is criticising a game for having shoddy graphics and terrifying motion capture. Who the hell does this upstart think he is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ersatz Nihilist Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 How dare Edge have the temerity to employ someone who didn't like Dragon Age. It's more like "How dare Edge have the temerity to employ somebody who can't write a decent review, who marked the game down because some of the women in it had sharp knees". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeyboy Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 I think a lot of people who have played Dragon Age would actually have no argument with the Edge review when it comes to the graphics. They are definitely below par. But it's still a very playable game. That's what counts, right? Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smitty Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 "...THe misery of dragon age's dramatic ambition is only compounded by the gruesome quality if it's motion capture and character modelling: the glassy, immobile faces and rigid poise, the unnaturally large pale hands which waft about the air with all the expressiveness of table tennis bats; the unequipped weapons which float some distance from each character's backs..." I think these sorts of issues are of the kind that gamers have always felt they need to get used to, and they appear in many different guises in many different games. In the past I feel that I was more able to put things like this aside, but as games get more detailed and complex, these kinds of problems I feel are becoming more far jarring and problematic. This might seem like a strange tangent, but it kinda puts me in mind of the whole discussion over fixing frame rates in games before moving onto the ever more advanced visuals. The question I find I ask myself more and more often nowadays is ''is this kind of thing acceptable - shouldn't we be getting the basics right?''. *edit* Something about games with massive budgets fucking basic things up, like Uncharted 2 and the whole picking up guns issue. Oh I also found the flat faces and stuff really off putting in Fallout 3. You're gonna spend a huge amount of time speaking to people in that game and they look fucking weird. I was almost instantly ''zzzzzz'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiper Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Smit: actually, that's one of the good things about DA (on PC and 360, at least) - it runs obscenely well, even on low-end machines. Far moreso than The Witcher, say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeJay Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Something about games with massive budgets fucking basic things up, like Uncharted 2 and the whole picking up guns issue. Oh I also found the flat faces and stuff really off putting in Fallout 3. You're gonna spend a huge amount of time speaking to people in that game and they look fucking weird. I was almost instantly ''zzzzzz'. Isn't this more about consistency within the game world. It's only jarring to see flat faces if the environment is beautifully detailed, for example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 FYI, the empty, weird monster-levelling Oblivion - with it's terrible voice acting and broken quests - got an 8. I had no idea that edge scored games on how they expect them to be viewed in 10 years time. That's amazing.Seriously now, Dark reign and hexen II were amazing at the time and fully deserving of their scores. Can't really comment on Duke or G-police as I haven't played the former and hate light-gun games. Again; it's the SOTN score we're looking at. That's the point. It was apparently on a par with these games. That is nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massive Invisible Dog Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 FYI, the empty, weird monster-levelling Oblivion - with it's terrible voice acting and broken quests - got an 8.Again; it's the SOTN score we're looking at. That's the point. It was apparently on a par with these games. That is nonsense. Fucking hell, there are still people who treat game scores like that? You're an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeJay Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 FYI, the empty, weird monster-levelling Oblivion - with it's terrible voice acting and broken quests - got an 8.Again; it's the SOTN score we're looking at. That's the point. It was apparently on a par with these games. That is nonsense. It's not nonsense at all, it's a subjective view of a gaming experience. There's no point doing this because I would take Dark Reign over SOTN any day of the week, that's what a subjective view is. They scored the same, I don't see anything wrong with that. The granularity in your arguement just isn't there. Anyhoo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmo Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 I can't believe Killzone 2 got more than Gunstar Heroes etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footle Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Smit: actually, that's one of the good things about DA (on PC and 360, at least) - it runs obscenely well, even on low-end machines. Far moreso than The Witcher, say. And the graphics, once you're out of the Korani Wilds, are consistent - occasionally with bits that are quite pretty. I'm certainly not spending time worrying about less-than-perfect lip synching, or relatively flat facial expressions: the game is far more involving than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeJay Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 I can't believe Killzone 2 got more than Gunstar Heroes etc. Edge crimes against games list: 1.MK:DD 5 2.Gunstar heroes 6 3. dragon age 5 ... 2428. SOTN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superunknown Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Holy shit, really? I'd pretty much written it off as another DMC i.e. I'd play through it once and sorta enjoy it then forget all about it until six months later when I see some Saurian vids on youtube and lose my shit and play it again and realise I'd be better off just watching the youtube stuff because I'm not Saurian. That's exactly what I'll be doing - I loved DMC's style but just couldn't get good at it. I played the Bayonetta demo and got through it fine, but watched the Saurian video and realised that I know nothing. Still buying it mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSlugFormerlyKnownAsNap Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Mario Kart is rubbish though, no complaints there. But I do feel violated for Fallout 3 (7/10), Saints Row 2 (5/10) and Dragon Age: Origins (5/10) as all of these have been my (almost) favourite games of years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pompey88 Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Dragon Age is easily one of the best games I've played in ages... 5! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_debaser Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 The graphics in the screenshots of Bayonetta look shit, it's also got a shit name and is made by Sega who haven't done anything good since Super Monkey Ball. I'm calling shenanigans on the 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qazimod Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Whilst we're on bad judgement... they gave SFIII 3rd a 6 as well. Although I'm probably in a minority for feeling riled by that score... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 I can't believe that Saints Row 2 + Gunstar Heroes = Dragon Age + The Getaway. What planet do Edge live on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Craig Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 The graphics in the screenshots of Bayonetta look shit, it's also got a shit name and is made by Sega who haven't done anything good since Super Monkey Ball.I'm calling shenanigans on the 10. Sega are only publishing it. Also, F-ZERO GX says hi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corleth the Fey Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 The graphics in the screenshots of Bayonetta look shit, it's also got a shit name and is made by Sega who haven't done anything good since Super Monkey Ball.I'm calling shenanigans on the 10. Your mom's got a shit name etc........ Go Bayonetta! I was rather surprised to see that the UFC event that was held in Manchester the other week was brought to us by ..... Bayonetta! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Fucking hell, there are still people who treat game scores like that? You're an idiot. The lines! It's not nonsense at all, it's a subjective view of a gaming experience. There's no point doing this because I would take Dark Reign over SOTN any day of the week, that's what a subjective view is. They scored the same, I don't see anything wrong with that. The granularity in your arguement just isn't there. Edge are the all powerful font of knowledge, or some-such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massive Invisible Dog Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Funny joke, Disciple! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Funny joke, Disciple! Edge score one of the finest games of all time the same as many a game that people will barely play ever again/have faded and died. A game that will last the ages, a game that has not been usurped from it's rightful place as "Best sidescrolly RPG thing with weapons and that, and monsters!". Not that great 10 years ago, now amazing. Other games - as good as that 10 years ago, now nowhere. They are human(s) - or are they dancers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now