Jump to content

PlayStation 5 - Next gen is expensive


Eighthours
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Ghosty said:

 

Both next gen consoles will include them because downloading 200GB+ for a 4K game just isn't feasible. Much easier to install the core game off the disc then add a 30GB patch. 

At no point have I said they wouldn’t have them, but the sales figures don’t lie, it’s a dying format as an entertainment platform.... in fact all physical media is.The world is moving towards an all digital future, whether we like it or not. I treasure my physical library of retro carts from the Atari VCS onwards, but I haven’t bought a single physical game this gen for either PS4, X1 or Switch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how big a file size the next crop of games will be for the new consoles. Especially 8K.

 

(Wouldn't it be easier for game files to be compressed (zip) and then have the console unpacked it?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ghosty said:

It will be interesting to see how big a file size the next crop of games will be for the new consoles. Especially 8K.

 

(Wouldn't it be easier for game files to be compressed (zip) and then have the console unpacked it?)

 

8K is just marketing fluff - no games will actually be released to 8k barring some small indie games. Current graphics cards struggle with 4k as it is, let alone double that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, joffocakes said:

I assumed the 8k capability would refer to video output for films and TV rather than a rendering resolution for games.

You'd hope as much but then I was pretty dismayed at how quickly both manufacturers seemed to race to be the de rigueur home of 4K disregarding any hope of 1080 / 60fps as a minimum standard.

I expect this will be the same story with hitting the higher resolution being a priority over stable and consistent high performance. The higher framerate is unimportant to many people though so I guess it's fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, joffocakes said:

I assumed the 8k capability would refer to video output for films and TV rather than a rendering resolution for games.

Everything that's been said about 8K on these consoles lines up with the spec for HDMI 2.1. They'll technically be capable of 4K 120fps output and the like but that's down to the version of HDMI they'll be using. 

Personally I'm looking forward to Freesync (or whatever the official name for variable refresh rate is now) becoming a standard feature on TVs over the next 12 months. It's great on the One X but not enough TVs support it yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Ghosty said:

It will be interesting to see how big a file size the next crop of games will be for the new consoles. Especially 8K.

 

(Wouldn't it be easier for game files to be compressed (zip) and then have the console unpacked it?)


This is effectively what happens already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnC said:

I'm not sure people will be buying 8K TVs so quickly, so 8K games seems like a wasted effort. 4K with better framerate or whatever seems more sensible.

 

The PS5 will probably be Sony's last console endeavour. So 8k support seems sensible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Stanley said:

Imagine something like Geometry Wars in 8K with HDR on a huge top end display though :o

 

It would be essentially indistinguishable from the same game at 4K. Even standing a few inches from the screen you'd struggle to differentiate the two. Resolution suffers badly from diminishing returns at this level - I can't see most devs worrying about 8K next gen, with ray tracing I reckon you'll see several games come in well under 4K but look amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, petrolgirls said:

 

It would be essentially indistinguishable from the same game at 4K. Even standing a few inches from the screen you'd struggle to differentiate the two. Resolution suffers badly from diminishing returns at this level - I can't see most devs worrying about 8K next gen, with ray tracing I reckon you'll see several games come in well under 4K but look amazing.

I’d love to see stuff at 1080 30fps but with all the graphical bells and whistles just to see what is possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Stanley said:

I’d love to see stuff at 1080 30fps but with all the graphical bells and whistles just to see what is possible. 

 

You can already. Super sampling is added to most 1080p games on the Pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ghosty said:

 

You can already. Super sampling is added to most 1080p games on the Pro.

Super sampling isn’t all the graphical bells and whistles! I presume he’s talking about ramping up particle systems, fancier lighting, that kind of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ghosty said:

 

You can already. Super sampling is added to most 1080p games on the Pro.

I meant in terms of draw distance, lighting, graphical effects, shadows, ray tracing, foliage and NPC density etc - basically a completely maxed out simulation at an acceptable 1080/30 on next gen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, petrolgirls said:

Even standing a few inches from the screen you'd struggle to differentiate the two.

Is this true? I remember when people were saying you needed to be a few inches from the screen to differentiate between 1080 and 4K. I sit over 5m away and I can easily see the difference!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stanley said:

I meant in terms of draw distance, lighting, graphical effects, shadows, ray tracing, foliage and NPC density etc - basically a completely maxed out simulation at an acceptable 1080/30 on next gen. 

 

30fps? I would be shocked if every game wasn't 60 as a bare minimum.

 

Ray tracing is more of a Nvidia thing? Does AMD have support for it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ghosty said:

 

30fps? I would be shocked if every game wasn't 60 as a bare minimum.

 

Ray tracing is more of a Nvidia thing? Does AMD have support for it?

I would prefer 60 too for the most part but I’d like to see what the machines are capable of at 30fps, especially in games where it’s not as important, adventure, RPG, walking simulators etc. I’m imagining something like Everyone’s Gone To The Rapture. 
 

I think they’ve both announced their next generation consoles will have ray tracing.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stanley said:

I would prefer 60 too for the most part but I’d like to see what the machines are capable of at 30fps, especially in games where it’s not as important, adventure, RPG, walking simulators etc. I’m imagining something like Everyone’s Gone To The Rapture. 
 

I think they’ve both announced their next generation consoles will have ray tracing.
 

 

 

I don't know much about ray tracing to be honest. I know it can make older games look newer. Better lighting and effects, etc. Quake 2 is a good example of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ghosty said:

 

I don't know much about ray tracing to be honest. I know it can make older games look newer. Better lighting and effects, etc. 

Yes I think that’s basically what it is - more realistic lighting, shadows and reflections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, JPL said:

Is this true? I remember when people were saying you needed to be a few inches from the screen to differentiate between 1080 and 4K. I sit over 5m away and I can easily see the difference!

 

Time for THE GRAPHS:twisted:

 

These are the ones that I used to see posted a lot:

 

cKwLiVr.png

 

pSmGSJq.png

 

But now they seem to be superseded by this contradictory one, which apparently is different because it accounts for our perception of colour and motion:

 

zSRSeVE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JPL said:

Is this true? I remember when people were saying you needed to be a few inches from the screen to differentiate between 1080 and 4K. I sit over 5m away and I can easily see the difference!

Is finishing returns a real thing ? Yes . It all depends on the size of your screen and your distance from it . 
yes you can tell 4K From 1080 but it’s not the leap that 480 to 1080 is , despite being proportionally (give  or take) the same increase in pixels 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.