Jump to content

Formula One - 2022 - Rllmuk League is live


T Pot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mexos said:

Tomorrow then.

 

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/red-bull-aston-martin-agree-f1-cost-cap-breach-deals-with-fia/10391176/

 

If RB have agreed it it that says to be it’s going to be pretty lightweight. 
 

I’ll guess at something pathetic like a £1m fine and a 3% wind tunnel or CFD time reduction.


That would be my guess as well. Such a small reduction in win tunnel time is meaningless when they’re so far ahead. The FIA might ban them from a couple of free practice sessions next season as well just to make it look like a serious punishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping to be surprised and the given a retroactive points deduction. Unlikely.

 

It really needs to be a deterrent though, no good having teams weighing up whether it's worth them going over the cap. The punishment needs to be severe enough to be crippling.

 

Braun will look a fool if it's a light punishment that doesn't have 'bite'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully it will be really weak and bring on a Truss style backlash and collapse - a few U turns later and an actual penalty will be imposed.

 

The worst case (and most likely) scenario is a penalty that doesn’t really cost Redbull anything but looks good in the press - 100 point deduction and 100m fine that doesn’t come out of cost cap, utterly meaningless but looks harsh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lewis Hamilton has revealed he plans to sign a new "multi-year" contract with Mercedes that will see the seven-time world champion race into his forties.

The 37-year-old said earlier in his career that he did not envisage racing to such an age, but after losing out to Red Bull's Max Verstappen on two successive drivers' titles, insists Mercedes "have a championship that we need to get back".

 

Let's hope it doesn't end in a vettel-style slide in performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Blue said:

Let's hope it doesn't end in a vettel-style slide in performance.


Indeed. I do think from what he’s said in the past that when he feels it, he’ll call time. Harder obvs if that comes before an 8th mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sidewaysbob said:

It's taken him sixth months, but the Lewis of old is back. 

 

Did he ever go away? I think he will have know the second the team knew the car wasnt going to be fixed this season so he took on all the testing / new parts etc that affected his practice sessions / quali and even race results - of late he has comfortably out performed George from the outside looking at quali / race results etc but not sure thats down to Lewis being ‘back’ or just circumstances of earlier results being down to different approach to improve the car for the long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of things that are never going away:

 

image.png.2ced444049fd99ed29e6baf580d0113d.png

 

Everyone assuming (correctly) that RB are going to get off pretty much scot free is just dragging it all up again. 

 

image.png.f22b1807c58ef9613b4c3bbb17a353a1.png

 

17.30 is apparently when we'll see what they've cooked up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the FIA found that RB had not taken up a tax subsidy that they were allowed which would have cut 1.4M off the overspend, making it a 0.37% overspend, which has figured into their consideration of the penalty.

The FIA statement reads "There is no accusation or evidence that RB racing has sought at any time to act in bad faith, dishonestly or in a fraudulent manner, nor has it willfully concealed any information from the cost cap administration."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So their original submission was $5m under, the FIA checked and found them $1.8m over and even taking into account their tax rebate they’d still be $400k over the cost cap. I’m struggling to believe Red Bull acted in good faith or that they left $5m unspent after all their complaining about Silverstone and Hungary. The $7m is meaningless because it doesn’t apply to the cost cap and isn’t going to harm them financially in anyway and even the 10% reduction only takes them from 70% to 63% because they are constructors champions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.