Archie Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 One of Empire's free screening thingys. My initial reaction is... Tony Scott has gone insane. I've liked his stuff for a long time but this is shot more like an epileptic music video than a film. Plot isn't much to speak of, Click For Spoiler Broken man haunted by his past (blah blah blah) is employed to protect a girl who of course breaks down his facade, just before being kidnapped. Washington goes on killing spree through everyone involved after she is (not) killed, then sacrifices himself to rescue her at the end. But I don't have so much of problem with that, however well-worn the story may be. I can't take much more camerawork like this - it's as bad as Bourne Supremacy in places, worse in others. Insane use of filters, incredibly shaky handheld work, extreme closeupsTM, blurred zooming, slowed-down and odd-frame sequences, strobe light cuts and constant freeze shots of nothing in particular. Subtitles used all over the place, fading in various 'imaginative' ways, even when the characters are speaking English! I suppose looking back, you could see Scott was heading in this direction with Spy Game but the editing tricks were used in moderation there and I liked the visual style. This doesn't look like a Tony Scott film, and the camera tricks make it difficult to watch. It wasn't bad, decent acting, reasonable writing and action but I expected a lot better. Ah well, at least it was free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrispinG Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 It's failed already for me. I just can't take Denzel Washington seriously as an action hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V3zna Posted October 9, 2004 Share Posted October 9, 2004 I liked Man on Fire for all the reasons you didn't like it. I loved the cinematography and the actual film was enjoyable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFly Posted October 9, 2004 Share Posted October 9, 2004 Tony Scott is great but i also fall into the cant take Denzel as an action hero camp, hes just not cool enough, better in Crimson tide type role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie Posted October 9, 2004 Author Share Posted October 9, 2004 The generally positive reviews I've been seeing make me think I should see it again. Maybe I didn't like it because I had to sit in the third row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V3zna Posted October 9, 2004 Share Posted October 9, 2004 Tony Scott is great but i also fall into the cant take Denzel as an action hero camp, hes just not cool enough, better in Crimson tide type role. I was never really a huge fan of DW's until I saw Training Day. He was absolutely immense in that film and I thought he was excellent in Man on Fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will Posted October 9, 2004 Share Posted October 9, 2004 What about the moral issue that surrounds the film? I havn't seen it but there's been controversy over Denzil's use of torture in the film... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted October 9, 2004 Share Posted October 9, 2004 The character in this movie had the attitude and balls that Thomas Jane should have had in Punisher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFly Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 I was never really a huge fan of DW's until I saw Training Day. He was absolutely immense in that film and I thought he was excellent in Man on Fire. While i can dig what you say, i dont really like Training Day that much Narc is far better drug cop thriller. I still want to see MOF, good date movie or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V3zna Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 What about the moral issue that surrounds the film? I havn't seen it but there's been controversy over Denzil's use of torture in the film... The torture scenes are pretty graphic, and original, but the people that are being tortured deserve it within the context of who they are in the film. Bad people deserve bad endings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.M.S Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 Saw this a few weeks ago on a plane, enjoyed it alot, it's well worth seeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V3zna Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 While i can dig what you say, i dont really like Training Day that much Narc is far better drug cop thriller. I still want to see MOF, good date movie or not? Narc was another superb film. No better or no worse than the wonderful Training Day imo. Dunno about MOF as a date movie though. I can't say why I think it might be but there are a couple of brutal torture scenes as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFly Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 Narc was another superb film. No better or no worse than the wonderful Training Day imo. Fair dos man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 I was never really a huge fan of DW's until I saw Training Day. Malcolm x Courage Under Fire Crimson Tide Cry Freedom ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V3zna Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 Malcolm xCourage Under Fire Crimson Tide Cry Freedom ?? I am not disputing his performance in those films but in Training Day he completely blew me away. I suppose he's always been a great actor and I just didn't appreciate him until recent times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanR Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 Malcolm xCourage Under Fire Crimson Tide Cry Freedom ?? The Hurricane Anyway, better or worse than A man apart? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rin Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 I can't remember what I posted on here months ago when I saw it, but I remember the film taking an absolute age to get going. But when it did, it was reasonably good. Overlong, maybe, but I found Washington to act the part well even if it did look a bit ridiculous at the end. It's obvious parts of the character's personality doesn't suit the actor at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V3zna Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 I can't remember what I posted on here months ago when I saw it, but I remember the film taking an absolute age to get going. 90 minutes by my calculations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rin Posted October 10, 2004 Share Posted October 10, 2004 Yeah. And the trailer makes it seem like it happens right at the start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V3zna Posted October 13, 2004 Share Posted October 13, 2004 Anyway, better or worse than A man apart? Are you talking about the Vin Diesel film? If so, I have just finished watching 'A Man Apart' and I want my 100 minutes back. What the fuck sort of ending was that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phybron Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 My initial reaction is... Tony Scott has gone insane. I've liked his stuff for a long time but this is shot more like an epileptic music video than a film. Plot isn't much to speak of, I kind of agree. I liked the film, but I couldn't help being slightly annoyed by the fact that the craft and technique of film-making were made so apparent. Surely a good cinematographer, director and editor should make the movie compulsive viewing, without making the audience notice the cinematography, directing and editing processes. It's a bit like they're all (Tony Scott most of all I guess) trying too hard to show us how great they are at making films and their mastery of filmic techniques, over and above telling the story of the film. It's like watching a directors' showreel. And I read somewhere about Scott revolutionising the use of subtitles. Really? I just found them irritating flying about all over the place and translating Mexican-accented English for the benefit of morons. Denzel Washington was great, but he always is. Mis-cast though. He's just not a convincing alcoholic. He was not the first choice, according to imdb.com: Robert De Niro, Will Smith and Bruce Willis were offered the role of Creasy.Marlon Brando was the original choice to play Creasy. Denzel Washington was cast in this film because of a trip to a doctor. He ran into director Tony Scott in the waiting room of a medical office and the two men started chatting. Scott had not seen Washington in person since they worked together on Crimson Tide (1995). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurelius Posted October 20, 2004 Share Posted October 20, 2004 Watched it yesterday! Excellent film! Sort of a hybrid between Kill Bill and Trainig Day. Click For Spoiler Only the ending was a bit weak, with him dying in the car and that cop shooting “the voice”. I was expecting Creasy to have one of those bombs up his ass and take the kidnappers out in a big explosion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X Posted October 20, 2004 Share Posted October 20, 2004 I watched the movie on DVD (R1) on Monday. Must say that I enjoyed it overall. I thought the "look" of the movie fitted well! I didn't think it was too long (146 minutes makes for a farily substantial movie). I wonder if there were any cuts for the UK release as it was violent in places. Nice to see a DTS movie release (hence the lack of extras I suppose... other than 2 commentaries). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello Goaty ♥ Posted October 20, 2004 Share Posted October 20, 2004 It reminded me of Leon ( The Professional ) a hell of a lot! and so, I liked it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Dear's Menu Posted October 20, 2004 Share Posted October 20, 2004 My ending: I would have had the bad guy be so smart that he strips Creasy naked -- no gun, no watch, nothing. He's naked in the motor. It would have been fun to make him sit on newspaper, because the seats are leather and the bad guy doesn't want to have to clean them. Maybe have him get pissed at all the blood or something. Make it a real blunt, dehumanizing experience for the dying Creasy. So the bad guy takes Creasy to his hideout -- naked and unarmed... And BOOM! Death by C4 anal charge! (Callback to the guy Creasy exploded under the bridge). Distasteful -- but they *did* set it up. Maybe Walken coulda shown up with his own anal charge for some real ASSassination! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Geet Posted October 20, 2004 Share Posted October 20, 2004 I like DW but I really didn't like this film. I didn't even watch to the end as it was so predictable...of course now everyone will tell me there is a massive twist. I found the little girl utterly repellent...she was some sort of 30 year old stuck in a child's body. It made the whole relationship seem almost unwholesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry Tate Posted October 20, 2004 Share Posted October 20, 2004 I'm sorry if someone has already mentioned this but I didn't see it and it is well worth repeating. Best use of subtitles ever in any movie! They don't just appear on the screen, they assault the viewer as the appear in different places all the time and in different size's. Bloody, fantastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubergine Posted November 11, 2004 Share Posted November 11, 2004 Watched this last night. Overall I enjoyed it, I didn't really expect to as normally I can't stand DW, he was pretty good in this, although I think it would've suited Willis a lot more... The beginning dragged a little and maybe got a little too sentimental for my liking, the middle was great, not quite as brutal as I expected/wanted though, the end was sort of disappointing (I was expecting some sort of c4 charge in "The voice's" brother) but not terrible. The editing got a little OTT in some places for my liking too. Still a pretty good film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Pibe Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 Just watched this today. Not sure if I liked it or not. It was annoying to watch at times because of the silly 'Ooooo look at me directing' shots. The little girl was a bit odd. Some good violence, though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Couch Corpse Posted August 28, 2006 Share Posted August 28, 2006 The character in this movie had the attitude and balls that Thomas Jane should have had in Punisher. Yes! I found the little girl utterly repellent...she was some sort of 30 year old stuck in a child's body. It made the whole relationship seem almost unwholesome. Yep, it doesn't work if you want the kid dead. Same as Ransom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now