Archie Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 This is not a beard. Despite having seen this film a number of times that's probably in double figures, I still don't understand why Click For Spoiler Tyler dies/disappears/whatever. Jack shoots himself in the mouth: so what? 'My eyes are open'? Eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Headache Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 I can't remember myself. Something to do with realising he can take control of his life? Click For Spoiler I really didn't care once they revealed the plot twist. I know lots of people really love the film but I just thought the whole split personality thing was a joke. That and the apocalyptic ending which I found a stretch of the imagination too far even for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirkCrisis Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler It's and EXTREME cure for schizophrenia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabreman Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Like Dirk says, I suppose shooting himself in the head is the cathartic act needed to rid himself of Tyler, rather than simply knowing Tyler doesn't exist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disgraced Toblerone Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Fincher is the most overrated director alive, with Jeunet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Jameson Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler I thought Tyler died because the Narrator shoots himself and believes he will die. (Un)fortunately, the bullet ricochets off the Narrator's teeth and out through his cheek, so he physically survives. CJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler I thought Tyler died because the Narrator shoots himself and believes he will die. (Un)fortunately, the bullet ricochets off the Narrator's teeth and out through his cheek, so he physically survives. CJ Click For Spoiler I thought he knew he was going to shoot himself in the side of the mouth. Wouldn't a bullet, at that range, smash through teeth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Jameson Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler I thought he knew he was going to shoot himself in the side of the mouth. Wouldn't a bullet, at that range, smash through teeth? Click For Spoiler If the Narrator knew he was deliberately going to miss his brain and shoot through his cheek, wouldn't Tyler know too? That's why I wonder if it was just accidental. I suppose the bullet could just deflect off his teeth if the gun wasn't pointed straight at them? Seems unlikely, I know. ...Just checked the book and it is pretty ambiguous too. CJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler The premise of the film is simple - I think it's a classic love story. Jack (Norton) wants to be loved. His life is empty, and he wants more than his material posessions and unpleasantly pleasant work collegues. To find himself he does some stupid things, even creates an alter ego who loves him - but Jack has a destructive personality. He cocks up everything. His relationship with Bonhem Carter, his relationships with Tyler, and takes it to extreme levels at the end of the film when he blows stuff up. Or that's what I though immediately upon seeing the conclusion to the film Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler If the Narrator knew he was deliberately going to miss his brain and shoot through his cheek, wouldn't Tyler know too? That's why I wonder if it was just accidental. I suppose the bullet could just deflect off his teeth if the gun wasn't pointed straight at them? Seems unlikely, I know. ...Just checked the book and it is pretty ambiguous too. CJ Click For Spoiler You could speculate that he'd earlier attempted to rid himself of Tyler when he burnt his arm with acid. Although this is a long shot to be honest, Jack is obviously some sort of pain junkie at heart too. I'd probably think it's much like teenagers cutting themselves when they are messed up in the head.Regardless, shooting yourself IN THE MOUTH is a pretty potent way to snap yourself out of something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelthink Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler I read somewhere that Bonhem Carter's character was a figment of Mr Norton's imagination as well. Can't remember where I read that, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eighthours Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Fincher is the most overrated director alive, with Jeunet Click For Spoiler Utter crap. Fincher is a genius. Seven and Fight Club, any other director would sell their soul to the devil to have those 2 films on their CV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Utter crap. Fincher is a genius. Seven and Fight Club, any other director would sell their soul to the devil to have those 2 films on their CV. All this spoiler stuff is a bit silly now isn't it? Was I the only one who found Seven a little obvious? I got the ending easily. Click For Spoiler Beautiful wife. Head in a box delivery. EASY. So much for the twist. And Spacey didn't have to do much really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disgraced Toblerone Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 All this spoiler stuff is a bit silly now isn't it?Was I the only one who found Seven a little obvious? I got the ending easily. Beautiful wife. Head in a box delivery. EASY. So much for the twist. Erm, what did you say about spoilers? Eighthours : well, I'm pretty sure most directors would love to be as higly rated as fincher with such an average output, but that's not what you were saying, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughes Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler I read somewhere that Bonhem Carter's character was a figment of Mr Norton's imagination as well. Can't remember where I read that, though. Click For Spoiler Apparently, in the book, it goes into a little bit of detail that she is definitely real, I wouldn't know as I've not read it. It could make sense though, when Norton chases her across the road at the start of the film, she runs across and no cars swerve to avoid hitting her, as if she wasn't there, whereas they swerve and screech as norton runs across. Another thing I noticed is that when Brad and Norton talk about that calvin klein models 6pack etc, they claim 'self improvement is masturbation'. Later in the film, whilst Brad is shagging Helena, Norton is doing sit ups, ie self improvement. And if Helena doesn't exist, the sex = masturbation. All open to each individual viewers interpretation though, as with all films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Erm, what did you say about spoilers?Eighthours : well, I'm pretty sure most directors would love to be as higly rated as fincher with such an average output, but that's not what you were saying, I think. Pfft. If you haven't seen Seven by now, don't ever watch it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calum Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eighthours Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Er.... would you like to put the spoiler in? Click For Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnj Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Apparently, in the book, it goes into a little bit of detail that she is definitely real, I wouldn't know as I've not read it. It could make sense though, when Norton chases her across the road at the start of the film, she runs across and no cars swerve to avoid hitting her, as if she wasn't there, whereas they swerve and screech as norton runs across. Another thing I noticed is that when Brad and Norton talk about that calvin klein models 6pack etc, they claim 'self improvement is masturbation'. Later in the film, whilst Brad is shagging Helena, Norton is doing sit ups, ie self improvement. And if Helena doesn't exist, the sex = masturbation. All open to each individual viewers interpretation though, as with all films. That's something I'd not considered at all, so well done hugh! I'm goignto read the book again now I think. ETA: having to seen your post in hate thread the exclaimation mark is not meant to be sarcastic at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whizzo Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Two Guys see some nutter beating himself up so they decide to join his club? And that is why I cant take that film seriouslyClick For Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pob Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler Two Guys see some nutter beating himself up so they decide to join his club? And that is why I cant take that film seriouslyClick For Spoiler Click For Spoiler This is the problem with Fight Club. It's amazing when you first watch it, and at the twist you're all like, "woah dude, that's a serious head fuck!"But the twist undermines the rest of the film. Once you know Tyler doesn't exist, you can't enjoy the film in the same way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a big boy Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Why not? Anyway, fuck spoiler tags. Anyone that wants to read a thread about the ending of a film without having the ending spoiled for them doesn't deserve to witness such a masterpiece in the first place. My interprtation was that Tyler is Jack's shadow manifested into "reality" (his reality) rather than through his dreams (usually the gateway to the unconscious), since he suffers from insomnia. As Jack says in the film, "When you suffer from insomnia, you're never really asleep and you're never really awake". By making the conscious decision to commit an act of self-harm as extreme as shooting yourself in the mouth (as opposed to unconsciously either directly through or as instructed by his shadow, Tyler), Jack succeeds in integrating his shadow personality into his self and he ceases to exist. This is why the film ends with him standing next to Marla (his anima and the next integration in the individuation process) and the greatest song of all time, "Where is my Mind?" plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Click For Spoiler This is the problem with Fight Club. It's amazing when you first watch it, and at the twist you're all like, "woah dude, that's a serious head fuck!"But the twist undermines the rest of the film. Once you know Tyler doesn't exist, you can't enjoy the film in the same way. You can. Because you spot things second time round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choduk Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 Yeah, I thought it was because he had every intention of killing himself and Tyler too. But when the bullet missed in the physical world it still hit Tyler right through the brain in the alternate reality. It's all to do with his intention to kill himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 ' date='Jan 26 2005, 11:16 PM'] Yeah, I thought it was because he had every intention of killing himself and Tyler too. But when the bullet missed in the physical world it still hit Tyler right through the brain in the alternate reality. It's all to do with his intention to kill himself. But didn't he put the gun in the SIDE of his mouth? He didn't really miss from there now did he Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pob Posted January 26, 2005 Share Posted January 26, 2005 You can. Because you spot things second time round. Yes, but that's only fun in a Where's Wally type way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now