Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The defence for Emery you could give is Pep, Potch and Klopp struggled in their first season in the league. But I wasn’t really sure about him. He’s built Sevilla team that won Europa but they weren’t exciting or anything special to be honest. Even at Valencia the fans got fed up eventually even though he was getting them champions league places. 

 

The Sokratis signing surely has to be Mislintats signing. The Lichtsteiner signing was a strange one. The warning signs are there when Juve a side who loves free signings let’s a player go on a free. He was a good player on his day. But coming to the premier league at his age now was only going to go one way. 

 

I didnt think Emery was a exciting appointment, but just a yes man. But he needs to be given money to spend. Spending £50m or whatever when sides like Everton and West Ham are spending that on one player isn’t enough. 

 

Arsenal went for the safe option in the summer. They could have gone for the risky in Arteta or the big option in Allegri. But nothing is going to change as long as the board start showing ambition. When even someone like Arteta has issues with the budget being offered to him then there are issues.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, The Fox said:

Bad times when you’re hoping for Cal Chambers to save the day.

 

8 hours ago, Shoes said:

Has anyone seen Chambers play at the back this year? He's been fucking awful.

 

Would fit right in

Link to post
Share on other sites

There’s no comfort to be had from Guardiola and Klopp struggling in their first seasons. One had infinite money to play with, and the other sold three attackers for an insane sum. Obviously Liverpool reinvested that money extremely well, but we don’t have that option available to us. They’re also both clearly superior coaches to Emery anyway.

 

The only player who was actually worth a decent fee, we declined to sell in the summer and now he sits on the bench most of the time waiting to leave on a free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm conflicted on Ramsey, he shows flashes of greatness yet will often be incredibly wasteful, tactically lacks discipline and has a poor injury record. I don't think that makes him a player you give one of the biggest contracts you've ever handed out and his departure is not something you pay any money to avoid. 

 

Sure those big teams are interested in him but only because he's available on a free (I know its not truly free and his wages will be huge) - doubt many of them would be waving a huge fee at us if he had 3-4y left on a contract. 

 

Huge mistakes have been made of course, not least in letting him get to this point whilst paying Ozil £300k a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Gotters said:
Sure those big teams are interested in him but only because he's available on a free (I know its not truly free and his wages will be huge) - doubt many of them would be waving a huge fee at us if he had 3-4y left on a contract. 

 

The biggest clubs in Europe don’t sign mediocre players just because they’re out of contract. He’s a bloody good footballer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, The Fox said:

 

The biggest clubs in Europe don’t sign mediocre players just because they’re out of contract. He’s a bloody good footballer.

 

I suspect, apart from Milan, they see him as a squad player who is now available for squad player wages with no huge fee.

 

Everybody keeps talking about how Arsenal have ballsed this up but its possible his agents have too, we'll never know what was on the table from Arsenal to sign but wonder if the eventual contract he ends up with is bigger or not. BBC gossip today says Juve offered him £138k a week, a huge wage but if Arsenal were trying to appease him before pulling the deal suspect our offer was higher (but of course contracts have all sorts of add ons and bonuses/fees added in).

Link to post
Share on other sites

If £138,000 a week was what it would take to keep him we should have paid it. 

 

There's loads of overpaid dead wood in the squad but I don't think Ramsey part of that group. There are plenty of others I would get rid of first.

 

We'll have to see about whether he's seen as a squad player by who ever he goes to. Personally I want him to stay and play regularly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they're taking a stand with him to prove a point - the club had gone totally soft under Wenger and it will take years to rectify those fundamental issues, not half a season. Time and time again players held a knife to the clubs throat and ran down their deals, at a scale no other top club sees. 

 

Holding the club to ransom and won't sign a contract, you're out. Won't track back and play how the manager wants, you're on the bench or at home.

 

I agree that in the current era that is a wage he can easily get - but I think there is a bigger play going on that is unique to us at the moment and if it takes losing him to start to heal those root fundamental issues then I'm ok with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Stagger Lee said:

If £138,000 a week was what it would take to keep him we should have paid it. 

 

There's loads of overpaid dead wood in the squad but I don't think Ramsey part of that group. There are plenty of others I would get rid of first.

 

We'll have to see about whether he's seem as a squad player by who ever he goes to. Personally I want him to stay and play regularly.

 

Its not just £138k he is making. He’s going to be getting  a massive signing on fee so he can lower his wage demands to the club that want him on a free. Where as it will be obviously higher for Arsenal. 

 

I dont blame him. It’s his last chance to get a big contract and would be good for another British player to play abroad. It will be a loss for Arsenal, but I don’t think it will be a loss so bad that this time next year you’d be sitting here saying you would have won the game if you had Ramsey. You’ve lost better players in the last decade or so. 

 

Your board need to start showing ambition. Restricting the manager to loan signings in January is just stupid. The squad and club needs a lift. Look at what Van Dijk did to Liverpool last January. You still got a lot to play for this season. You won’t be getting top four or even winning the Europa if you have Mustafi in your defence. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Gotters said:

I think they're taking a stand with him to prove a point - the club had gone totally soft under Wenger and it will take years to rectify those fundamental issues, not half a season. Time and time again players held a knife to the clubs throat and ran down their deals, at a scale no other top club sees. 

 

Holding the club to ransom and won't sign a contract, you're out. Won't track back and play how the manager wants, you're on the bench or at home.

 

I agree that in the current era that is a wage he can easily get - but I think there is a bigger play going on that is unique to us at the moment and if it takes losing him to start to heal those root fundamental issues then I'm ok with it.

 

Generally I agree with what you are saying. It might be that Ramsey is suffering from a shake up that will see us in better stead. 

 

If he doesn't fit with what the manager wants to do then yes we should let him go. From what I've seen he does have the attributes to be successful for us under Emery.

 

Also I don't think he's held the club to ramsom. He's looked at what we're paying other players and asked for parity. Mhikitaryan is on £200k per week...

 

33 minutes ago, Shevchenko said:

Your board need to start showing ambition. Restricting the manager to loan signings in January is just stupid. The squad and club needs a lift. Look at what Van Dijk did to Liverpool last January. You still got a lot to play for this season. You won’t be getting top four or even winning the Europa if you have Mustafi in your defence. 

 

This is all well and fine but if we are not going to spend in Jan and funds are going to be tight letting Ramsey go for a free is even more mental. It will cost us more in the short term to replace him than to up his wages and offer him a contract. If he signs a new contract he becomes a financial asset again.

 

Also I love Ramsey. I really want Welsh Jesus to stay.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On a slightly different note I was thinking of all the players that seem to be out of favour/not suitable under Emery/too old. It's quite a lengthy list...

 

Ramsey

Ozil

Mhikitaryan

Mustafi

Lichsteiner

Elneny

Monreal

Kos

Welbeck

Jenkinson

Chambers

 

Maybe Cech & Sokratis too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that really didn't feel like a 4-1 game to watch - both defences looked like they were from teams that will be relegation threatened in all honesty, and but for some wasteful finishing in the first half we'd have been behind.

 

chorus of boos met the now traditional hooking of lacazette

 

it is still early days, and took both Pep and Klopp time to settle in the prem with huge budgets too, but the constant tinkering with half time subs and formation changes is starting now to look like not knowing what team to ever play, or how to get them lined up properly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whole club has been horribly mismanaged for a few years unfortunately.

 

Özil contract debacle.

 

Countless players’ contracts allowed to run down. In Alexis’ case we turned down a huge bid, seemingly assuming he’d put a shift in before the World Cup, but then Chile didn’t qualify and he became a complete pain in the arse who we couldn’t wait to be rid of.

 

Aside from him you’ve also got Szczesny, Wilshere, Ramsey, Welbeck, Gnabry and Reiss-Nelson all leaving for nothing.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good to see we're still targeting the problem positions, being linked with the Madrid keep Keylor Navas - a chap in my opinion (along with several others) to have a reputation and trophy cabinet that is thanks to the efforts of Ronaldo. 

 

is this bargain bin dented tin value shopping or wasting our precious limited resources where not really needed, the latter I think, especially as he's very flappy and not likely to instil any extra confidence in our rabbit in the headlights defenders. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, humdrum said:

Nelson just signed a long term deal and is only on loan in Germany?  Or are you thinking Wilcox?

 

did you mean Willock?

 

My son(!) says that Willock, Osei-Tutu, and the more obvious Smith-Rowe and Nketiah, should all be getting more 1st team action. That Iliev should be sufficient cover for Cech/Leno/Macey/(Ospina) and we don't need another keeper.

 

(and that Iwobi can't pass, in a similar "no end-product" style of another winger who shall not be named)

 

Smart kid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Use of this website is subject to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and Guidelines.